Today
everyone is abuzz about the movie "Noah". But I'm still thinking about
"God's Not Dead", which I saw a week ago. Here are a few belated
thoughts.
I kind of knew what to expect going into the film.
There's always this hope, when going to see a Christian movie, that this
one will be the one to pleasantly surprise you with a good script, good
acting, no melodrama, no Christian cliches, etc. "God's Not Dead" isn't that film. It follows all the predictability of the typical Christian movie.
The acting was largely stilted and lacking depth. Kevin Sorbo is a
good actor, and handled his parts well. But the rest of the acting
ranged between stiff and melodramatic, and sometimes both at the same
time. There were a few other highlights, other than with Sorbo, but it
was largely pretty bad. But one can't entirely blame the cast. No
doubt the directing and the script were partially to blame.
The
script came across as several interconnected scenes from a Jack Chick
tract (I'm not the first to point out the Chick tract connection).
Sure, the scenes somewhat reflected reality. But they were too
distantly related to anything real to be more than cartoonish. While
the movie was loosely based on college court cases defending Christian
freedom, have you ever known a college professor who would give a
student three classes to defend the existence of God? Or a student, in a
100-level class, smart enough to do it successfully? Or how about an
atheist professor who in a moment of anger would openly admit, before
his whole class, to hating God because he believed God had let him down?
The crowning jewel of silliness came after the student's last defense,
when all the students one by one stood up and proclaimed "God's not
dead". What world would this ever happen in? No, God isn't dead,
praise His Name. But He deserves better than this.
I will
leave the apologetics to the apologists to deal with, if they care to
bother. I will note that the apologetics followed a largely Evangelical
line. Two things to point out is the critique of the Big Bang, and the
appeal to free will. My guess is that most of the audience is like me,
in that the apologetics portions went by too fast and in too scattered a
way to be of any help. But I have a feeling that learning the
apologetics wasn't really the point. Christian movies, I've figured
out, tend to serve as a sort of pep rally, or cheerleading session. The
purpose is to get Christians pumped up about Christiany sorts of
things, whether they are rooted in Scripture or not. If you're looking
for any substance in a movie like this, your expectations are wrong.
There were a couple of bright spots. The young lady coming to grips
with her cancer was moving, if overdone. The scene near the end of the
movie, when the elderly woman with dementia began speaking truth out of
the blue to her angry businessman son, was like something out of
Flannery O'Connor. Quite good. But for every good scene like these,
there were several more that were horrible.
I think the most
appalling scene for me came at the end of the movie. Here, we see the
atheist professor, struggling with his atheism, and running to a
Newsboys concert to find his girlfriend (or wife?). Only in a Christian
film. He gets struck by a car, and has the weirdest, most unrealistic
conversation with a pastor, as his life slips away. The professor dies,
and we are immediately taken to the concert, where Willie Robertson,
via video, somewhat mocks the professor, who we've just watched die.
How the heck this could have gotten past the final edit, without it
being seen how distasteful the whole thing was, is beyond me. Then we
are taken back to the street where the accident happened, and we see the
pastor with his missionary friend, rejoicing that the professor, having
accepted Jesus into his heart, is now in heaven. But is this
realistic? Where is the mourning and sorrow in the face of death and
suffering? The coldness and shallowness of the whole thing was
disturbing.
A similar scene, right before this, is worth
mentioning. The young lady with cancer, who is a reporter, barges in on
the Newsboys before their concert, in an effort to cause them to doubt
their faith. And again, the lack of emotional depth in the way the
woman's sickness is dealt with is shocking.
One can take these
scenes, and the whole film, into consideration, and reasonably wonder if
this is really a reflection how the Christian community views
suffering, death, life, and salvation. If so, then it would explain why
the world doesn't look to us in their troubles. We really are out of
touch with reality. And making movies like this helps none at all.
1 comment:
I wish the movie was longer to flesh out some of the scenes. I think the classroom scene was realistic. There are some pretty arrogant professors who WOULD take on such a challenge and give a student an opportunity to prove such 'rubbish.' Due to events happening in the professor's life, one could expect such an outburst of emotion to come from him in a last resort effort to reach out to his students emotions since the 'proof' wasn't on his side.
I highly recommend the movie. It would've been nice if they had fleshed out more of the 'mini stories.' I agree that it was a pep rally for the saints -but the timing of the movies was 'perfect' in that it somewhat countered the 'Noah' and "heaven is for real' movies.
Post a Comment